eSpeed Inc. (NDAQ:ESPD) shares moved up $0.19, or 2.07%, to $9.38 after WC Capital disclosed a 6.4% in the company and expressed their concerns about the company's valuation. The activist hedge fund said that their analysis has led them to believe that the range of the company theoretical valuation could be considerably higher than the current share price, which could result in a value 28% to 70% greater ($12 to $16 per share) than the current valuation of $9.40 per share. The move comes after another large shareholder, Chapman Capital, disclosed a 9.3% stake and made similar demands that the company immediately put itself up for sale. The problem facing both shareholders is the fact that 88% of the company's voting power is controlled by Mr. Lutnick and his affiliates due to a classified share structure in which Class B shares have 10 votes each.

Problems began in early 2004 when several investors began to recognize a significant divergence between the performance of the company's common stock and its publicly traded peers. Specifically, in 2004 the company stock plummeted 47% while that of its peers remained flat, and in 2005 the company's stock dropped 37% while its peers added 49%. Then in January of 2006 there was a glimmer of hope when The Daily Telegraph reported that Cantor Fitzgerald was preparing a stock market float of BGC Partners, its London-based brokerage business, in a move that was expected to lead to a merger with eSpeed, the Nasdaq-quoted broker also controlled by Cantor, to create a company worth between $500 million and $1 billion. However, this deal never materialized. Then, in a highly questionable December 2006 Form 4 filing with the SEC, Mr. Lutnick was granted, free of cost, 800,000 Class A common stock options - representing 3% of the company's outstanding shares! This upset many investors who feared the potential dilutive effects of the options. Finally, the last straw came in February of this year when the company issued a press release that disclosed its FY2007 financial outlook. Investors were outraged to find out that company projected nearly break-even operating performance due to approximately $152 million of non-GAAP operating revenues being consumed by $146 to $148 million of non-GAAP operating expenses, a level of spending which investors have thought unacceptable.

Now, WC has suggested that the board of directors immediately review several strategic alternatives for the company:

1. Sale of the company
2. Conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares
3. Return of capital to shareholders (one-time dividend/share repurchases)
4. Initiation of procedures and structures increasing eSpeed autonomy

Clearly there are changes that need to be made to this company and with two shareholders now expressing concerns, maybe the company will institute some changes. Regardless, this is definitely a stock worth watching!

Related Companies
Global Payments Inc. (GPN)
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS)
MoneyGram International Inc. (MGI)