eSpeed Inc. (NDAQ:ESPD) shares moved down 7.66% today after the company released a statement saying that it sent a letter on April 19, 2007 to Terry Smith of Tullett Prebon plc stating that the board of directors has been formed by its controlling stockholder, Cantor Fitzgerald, that it is not interested in selling its controlling interest in the company to Tullett, in terminating its arrangements with eSpeed on terms proposed by Tullett in recent letters, or in proposing alternative terms to Tullett. More, the company said it is not in a position to pursue Tullett's acquisition proposal because such a proposal cannot be consummated without the consent of Cantor Fitzgerald - the company's controlling stockholder.

The company also commented on other demands made by activist shareholders. They stated that they cannot take any of the following actions without Cantor's express approval: (1) convert Cantor's Class B common shares into Class A common shares, (2) undertake any business combination with another entity, or (3) terminate the perpetual clearing, technology and other arrangements with Cantor and its affiliate BGC Partners. While the board is fully aware of its fudiciary duties, it has determined that it is unable to do anything without Cantor's approval. This leaves few alternatives for activist investors who continue to hold large stakes in the company, including WC Capital and Chapman Capital. They can put additional materials on the proxy, but with Cantor controlling the majority of the votes, it will be very difficult to make any meaningful changes. At this point, all shareholders can do is wait for a response from the hedge funds or perhaps another higher offer by Tullett that would be high enough for Cantor to consider.

Related Companies
Global Payments Inc. (GPN)
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS)
MoneyGram International Inc. (MGI)

The Topps Company, Inc. (NDAQ:TOPP) shares moved up marginally beyond the company's buyout premium amid shareholder and director criticism over its merger agreement with Tornate at $9.75 per share. Today, board director and 6.4% stakeholder Arnaud Ajdler reiterated his beliefs in a March 14th letter that the existing proposed merger is not in the best interest of the company's stockholders because the per share merger consideration is wholly inadequate and does not provide full and fair value to the company's stockholders.

The board director also let shareholders know of a part of the story that nobody else outside of the board knew. First, Topps did not solicit comments from Timothy Brog, John Jones, or Ajdler (board members opposing the proposal) or make available to them drafts of the merger proxy before filing it with the SEC. Secondly, there was a third bidder for the company (Bidder C) that proposed a purchase price that was $1 per share more than the current offer, not contingent on financing, had the potential to be raised even higher since this company was a strategic buyer. Third, the board of directors opposed a share buyback or special dividend to instead opt for a sale, stating it would be the best way to maximize shareholder value. Yet, the most recent share buyback program that was approved by the board had a top price of $10.62 per share. How can management and the board recommend paying up to $10.62 per share, but then approve a merger for $9.75 saying that it maximizes value? Finally, the company did not adequately shop itself as it suggested in its press releases. The merger proxy indicates that it only approached three financial buyers before entering into a deal with Tornate. The statement also makes it clear that Topps never approached Bidder C - its main competitor that had expressed interest in the company even before the announcement of a transaction with Madison Dearborn and Tornante.

Overall, it appears as if the company's board has violated its fudiciary responsibilities by ignoring superior bids and failing to maximize shareholder value. With the current stock price trading above the buyout premium, it appears as if most investors are hoping that the merger will fall though and other bids will be examined. This makes TOPP a stock worth watching!

Related Companies
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (WWY)
Champion Industries, Inc. (CHMP)
Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (CGX)

eSpeed Inc. (NDAQ:ESPD) shares moved up $1.13, or 11.71%, to $10.87 today after the company's takeover offer for Cantor was rejected. Meanwhile, Chapman Capital disclosed a 9.3% stake in the company and demanded consent to replace eSpeed directors at the company's 2007 annual meeting. The hedge fund also reiterated its demands that the board immediately retain an independent auditor to review the Joint Services Agreement, compel the conversion of all Class B common shares into Class A common stock, and engage an investment bank to maximize shareholder value via an auction of the company.

Robert L. Chapman, Jr., Managing Member of Chapman Capital, commented, "Chief Executive Howard Lutnick's three-kingdom reign over Cantor Fitzgerald, eSpeed and BGC Partners appears so infested with potential conflicts of interest and incestuous inter-company transactions that a completely new set of corporate governors may be required to exterminate any vermin from eSpeed's board room. Chapman Capital finds it astonishing that Mr. Lutnick may believe he retains the residual credibility necessary to bedazzle a new group of investors in the proposed BGC Class A concoction after stupefying eSpeed Class A shareholders with years of underperformance and apparent disrespect."

Regarding Chapman Capital's demand for the immediate auction of eSpeed, Mr. Chapman stated, "The non-return of 24 straight business days of telephone calls from eSpeed's largest Class A owner is something one might have expected from multi-kingdom conflicted tyrants such as Hollinger International's Conrad Black, but not someone as conscious of his public reputation as Mr. Lutnick. Moreover, today's disclosure of the seemingly impulsive rejection of Tullett Prebon Plc's premium acquisition proposal has done nothing but heighten our concerns that Napoleonic behavior continues to be condoned by eSpeed's director fiduciaries."

In the end, if the hedge fund is successful in obtaining seats on the company's board of directors, it is likely that there will be some kind of a process to explore a sale of the company. Until then, investors and shareholders have to wait to see if the company will take action to eliminate some of the barriers to making this happen. Regardless, this is definitely a stock worth watching!

View past eSpeed articles

Related Companies
Global Payments Inc. (GPN)
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS)
MoneyGram International Inc. (MGI)