Motorola, Inc. (NYSE: MOT) announced today that after an extensive analysis of its businesses that it will split into two distinct companies by spinning off its mobile phone unit.
 
Motorola, best known by consumers for its Razr phone, has been under significant pressure from activist Carl Icahn who has been pressuring the company to take action on its unprofitable cellular phone division. Motorola’s cell phone production had nearly $19 billion in sales in 2007 – which was a significant fall from 2006 but still made it the largest division in the company. Motorola’s communication equipment and “set-top box” unit are the actual profit drivers of the company.
 
The company plans to achieve the split by next year through “a tax-free distribution to [its] shareholders.”
 
In a press release, Motorola CEO Greg Brown said:
 
"Our decision to separate our Mobile Devices and Broadband & Mobility Solutions businesses follows a review process undertaken by our management team and Board of Directors, together with independent advisors. Creating two industry-leading companies will provide improved flexibility, more tailored capital structures, and increased management focus - as well as more targeted investment opportunities for our shareholders."
 
The real question is whether Motorola’s cell phone business is an “industry-leading” company. Despite the success of the Razr, cell phones have become a cut-throat business with razor-thin margins – no pun intended.
 
Regardless of how things play-out, it appears like Carl Icahn has scored another victory. Last year, Icahn basically forced then CEO Edward Zander from the company. Now, it appears as if Motorola, through the split, will become more aggressive about making its cell phone division profitable.
 
This saga probably isn’t near complete yet as Icahn will almost certainly be vocal about the exact manner of the split and the management choices for each new entity which definitely makes Motorola a stock worth watching.
 
Related Companies
Nortel Networks Corporation (NT)
Nokia Corporation (NOK)
Research In Motion Limited (RIMM)
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
Arris Group, Inc.  (ARRS)

WiMax has been the talk of the technology sector for a long time as the promise of a nationwide high-speed wireless network has many druling at the mouth. The companies behind the project are just as excited as the new network would provide them with licensing opportunities that could make them billions of dollars in the future. The only thing standing in the way is a $3 billion bill that needs to be paid to roll out the initiative. Luckily, cable companies are beginning to step in as the new backers.

The WiMax initiative began as a cooperation between Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) and Clearwire Corporation (NDAQ: CLWR) to create a nationwide wireless network using WiMax technology. The network is designed to provide high-speed web access from laptops, cellphones and other mobile devices as well as high-quality mobile video. The two were forced to explore other financing options after Sprint shareholders were unwilling to fully fund the venture, calling it excessively risky and expensive.

Cable companies have now stepped in to fill the void by taking partial ownership in the new venture. Comcast Corporation (NDAQ: CMCSA), the nation's largest cable operator, agreed to contribute as much as $1 billion into the venture alongside rival Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) who would add $500 million. Bright House Networks, the sixth largest cable operator, would also contribute between $100 million and $200 million, according to the WSJ.

Other potential investors include Intel Corporation (NDAQ: INTC) - who could contribute up to a billion dollars - and Google Inc. (NDAQ: GOOG) who may provide hundreds of millions of dollars. However, it is still possible that the entire deal could fall through if all these parties do not agree and the partnership is unable to raise the $3 billion that it needs to make the project happen.

The deal also has widespread implications for shareholders of all the companies. Sprint's shareholders have been the most vocal against the deal after the company told Wall Street that it expects the venture to cost $5 billion by 2010. This prompted many to propose that the initiative be spun off and funded by someone else entirely. Meanwhile, a move by cable companies into the fray would escalate the rivalries by throwing them into a whole new arena.

In the end, the WiMax initiative looks very promising for consumers and like a great future investment for the companies involved, but it comes at a great cost in the near term. This is a cost that many Sprint shareholders believe is too high while many other companies may not be willing to put forth as much capital as the partnership would like to see. Regardless, this is definitely a situation worth watching closely.

Related Companies
AT&T INc. (T)
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
Qwest Communications International Inc. (Q)
Embarq Corporation (EQ)
Telephone & Data Systems (TDS)

Clear Channel Communications (NYSE: CCU) shareholders are hearing a little static on the rumor airwaves and fleeing towards the nearest exit. Shares plummeted today after private equity firms and banks backing the $19 billion privatization of the nation's largest radio broadcaster failed to resolve their differences over final financing terms. Shareholders now have almost no confidence in the deal, which was slated to take place at $39.20. Instead, many analysts are now predicting shares to fall into the $20s.

The banks financing the deal were unable to create a credit agreement that satisfied all sides of the transaction. In particular, banks are concerned that if they lend the $22 billion needed to fund the deal, they would need to immediately write down the value of the loans as soon as the deal closes and book the losses. Since such debt has been typically marked down by 15%, this would equate to a $2.7 billion loss the moment the deal closes.  

Those involved insisted that there was still a chance that the deal could be salvaged, but the consensus remains that the deal looks unlikely to consummate. The bright side is that Clear Channel could then sue the private equity firms for breach of contract if the deal falls apart since it was not contingent on securing financing. This would help recoup some money, but do very little in the long run.

Clear Channel's business has also significantly deteriorated since the deal was first struck in November 2006. Bad news has been steadily rolling in since the buyout price was raised in the first quarter of 2007. Growth in its radio operations began to slow and then shrink as the firm's downward spiral became clear. Unfortunately for the buyers, the deal was already approved by shareholders so nothing could be done. Now, this burden may be shifted back to the shareholders.

In the end, a failed Clear Channel buyout would be the latest casualty in a series of high-profile busts since the credit market began to deteriorate. The banks and private equity firms at this point are likely still in the negotiations only to protect themselves from litigation by saying they put forth a noble effort. However, the potential losses from being sued for breach of contract still give shareholders some hope that a deal could take place. If not, shareholders could easily see their stock back in the $20s.

Related Companies
Saga Communications, Inc. (SGA)
Cox Radio, Inc. (CXR)
Citadel Broadcasting Corporation (CDL)
Radio One, Inc. (ROIAK)
Cumulus media Inc. (CMLS)
CBS Corporation (CBS)
Entercom Communications (ETM)